Center for Judicial Excellence

Justice. Accountability. Integrity.

  • About Us
    • CJE Board of Directors
    • CJE Staff
  • Donate
  • Contact CJE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Initiatives
    • Advocacy & Legislation
      • Media Advocacy
      • Policy & Legislation
      • Prior Legislative Victories
    • CJE Youth Speak
      • Forced “Reunification Camps”
    • U.S. Divorce Child Murder Data
    • Educating Oversight Agencies
    • Marin Court Misconduct
  • Resources
    • Family Court Crisis Background
    • Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Resources
    • Pro Bono Services, Self-Help Centers & Court Information
  • Media
    • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
    • Kids of Divorce Speak Out
    • CJE in the News
      • Online & Print
      • TV & Radio
      • Press Releases
    • The Director’s Corner
    • Special Projects
      • Film
      • Photo Exhibit
      • Slideshow
    • Photo Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
      • Advocacy Training
    • Previous Forums & Events
      • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
      • Santa Monica Weekend
      • People’s Choice Award!
      • 10 Year Anniversary Campaign
  • Take Action!
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Advocacy Training Sign-Up
    • Get Social
  • News
You are here: Home / News / How the Dismissed Theory of “Parental Alienation” Continues to Put Children in Danger

How the Dismissed Theory of “Parental Alienation” Continues to Put Children in Danger

March 21, 2021

Concerns about the ‘alienation plague’ that has infected family courts in the United States since the mid-1980’s are rapidly spreading across the world as there is a lot of money to be made in these cases. This article from New Zealand about the dangers of alienation in family court decision-making highlights the fact that “parental alienation syndrome” has long-since been dismissed as a theory without a clinical basis. But the ideas underpinning it – which mostly implicate women – remain embedded within the Family Court process.

“Despite his violence towards her involving threats to kill, strangulation, threats to kidnap the child … he was permitted regular unsupervised access with the infant.”

Contrary to the recommendations of the UN, there is currently no formal government process to review the use of alienation. However, the new NZ minister for the prevention of sexual and family violence, Marama Davidson, says the issue concerns her. Read more here.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print

Filed Under: News Tagged With: New Zealand, Parental alienation

Family Law Documentary Trailer

Recent News

Mother of murdered boy tried getting son back in weeks leading up to his death

May 20, 2023

Jonicia Clay sought a restraining order just one … [Read More...]

US child killings have risen rapidly – why are more states pushing for joint custody laws?

May 19, 2023

Early one day last year, Kellie Elliott stopped by … [Read More...]

Her son said his stepdad was sexually abusive. A judge gave the stepdad custody anyway. Then his mom found the photographs.

May 18, 2023

How the 'junk science' of parental alienation … [Read More...]

Custody battle preceded murder-suicide of SLC father and son

May 18, 2023

SALT LAKE CITY — We are continuing to learn more … [Read More...]

More news

News Archive

Contact Us

P.O. Box 150793
San Rafael, California 94915
Phone: 415-444-6556
Email:
info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org

Find Us on Facebook

Follow CJE on Twitter

My Tweets

Email List Signup

By entering your email address and clicking "Subscribe" you agree to receive email communications from the Center for Judicial Excellence.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Translate This Site

CJE DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. We want to hear your story, however, please be advised, if you choose to share information with us, we can not guarantee your privacy.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; CJE and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the appropriate jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances whether the information contained herein applies to your particular situation.

 

Copyright © 2023 Center for Judicial Excellence. All Rights Reserved.

Log in