Center for Judicial Excellence

Justice. Accountability. Integrity.

  • About Us
    • CJE Board of Directors
    • CJE Staff
  • Donate
  • Contact CJE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Initiatives
    • Advocacy & Legislation
      • Media Advocacy
      • Policy & Legislation
      • Prior Legislative Victories
    • CJE Youth Speak
      • Forced “Reunification Camps”
    • U.S. Divorce Child Murder Data
    • Educating Oversight Agencies
    • Marin Court Misconduct
  • Resources
    • Family Court Crisis Background
    • Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Resources
    • Pro Bono Services, Self-Help Centers & Court Information
  • Media
    • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
    • Kids of Divorce Speak Out
    • CJE in the News
      • Online & Print
      • TV & Radio
      • Press Releases
    • The Director’s Corner
    • Special Projects
      • Film
      • Photo Exhibit
      • Slideshow
    • Photo Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
      • Advocacy Training
    • Previous Forums & Events
      • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
      • Santa Monica Weekend
      • People’s Choice Award!
      • 10 Year Anniversary Campaign
  • Take Action!
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Advocacy Training Sign-Up
    • Get Social
  • News
You are here: Home / News / Recall Judge Persky leader takes issue with judicial commission finding

Recall Judge Persky leader takes issue with judicial commission finding

January 9, 2017

Recall campaign chair, Michele Dauber, addresses the media as recall supporters hold a rally near the Santa Clara County Hall of Justice in San Jose, Calif., Friday, Sept. 2, 2016. The rally was held to whip up support for ousting Judge Aaron Persky via a 2017 special recall election. Perks presided over the Brock Turner case which became a lightning rod for criticism after Brock received a sentence for sexual assault that many have deemed too lenient. (Patrick Tehan/Bay Area News Group)

The state Commission on Judicial Performance has spoken, rejecting the notion that the Santa Clara County judge who sentenced former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner to six months in jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious, intoxicated woman engaged in judicial misconduct.

But the Stanford law professor leading the movement to recall Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky has fired back with a scathing critique.

In her seven-page analysis, Professor Michele Dauber contends that the commission decided Persky had not exhibited bias in former Turner’s case or in four other cases based on erroneous information. For instance, she said, the commission said the judge was following the probation recommendation in some cases in which there was no full probation report. [Read Full Article]


Fact Check Report on the Commission on Judicial Performance Decision on Judge Persky– Committee to Recall Judge Persky – January 6, 2017

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print

Filed Under: News

Family Law Documentary Trailer

Recent News

What Happened to Jaevion Riley? 7-Year-Old New Hampshire Boy Dies

January 31, 2023

A seven-year-old boy has died after being … [Read More...]

Ava Wood’s father bought shotgun 16 days before apparent murder-suicide in Baldwinsville

January 24, 2023

BALDWINSVILLE, N.Y. — Christopher Wood purchased … [Read More...]

Alabama police identify 2012 ‘Baby Jane Doe’ remains, arrest parents

January 21, 2023

Alabama police, with the help of DNA technology, … [Read More...]

UPDATE: Man who Allegedly Murdered His Children in Murfreesboro Reportedly Killed his Wife in Alabama Approximately 2-Months Ago

January 20, 2023

(Murfreesboro, TN) We now have more details about … [Read More...]

More news

News Archive

Contact Us

P.O. Box 150793
San Rafael, California 94915
Phone: 415-444-6556
Email:
info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org

Find Us on Facebook

Follow CJE on Twitter

My Tweets

Email List Signup

By entering your email address and clicking "Subscribe" you agree to receive email communications from the Center for Judicial Excellence.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Translate This Site

CJE DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. We want to hear your story, however, please be advised, if you choose to share information with us, we can not guarantee your privacy.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; CJE and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the appropriate jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances whether the information contained herein applies to your particular situation.

 

Copyright © 2023 Center for Judicial Excellence. All Rights Reserved.

Log in

 

Loading Comments...