Center for Judicial Excellence

Justice. Accountability. Integrity.

  • About Us
    • CJE Board of Directors
    • CJE Staff
  • Donate
  • Contact CJE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Initiatives
    • Advocacy & Legislation
      • Media Advocacy
      • Policy & Legislation
      • Prior Legislative Victories
    • CJE Youth Speak
    • Educating Oversight Agencies
    • U.S. Divorce Child Murder Data
    • Marin Court Misconduct
  • Resources
    • Family Court Crisis Background
    • Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Resources
    • Pro Bono Services, Self-Help Centers & Court Information
  • Media
    • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
    • Kids of Divorce Speak Out
    • CJE in the News
      • Online & Print
      • TV & Radio
      • Press Releases
    • The Director’s Corner
    • Special Projects
      • Film
      • Photo Exhibit
      • Slideshow
    • Photo Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
      • Advocacy Training
    • Previous Forums & Events
      • Allen v. Farrow 2021 Panel Discussion
      • Santa Monica Weekend
      • People’s Choice Award!
      • 10 Year Anniversary Campaign
  • Take Action!
    • Donate
      • Join CJE – Membership
    • Volunteer
    • Advocacy Training Sign-Up
    • Get Social
  • News
You are here: Home / News / Recall campaign: State ruling that cleared judge is ‘error-ridden’

Recall campaign: State ruling that cleared judge is ‘error-ridden’

January 9, 2017

Michele Dauber, Stanford law professor and chair of the Recall Persky campaign, speaks during a rally in downtown San Jose following the Sept. 2, 2016, release of Brock Turner, who served half of his six-month sentence. Photo by Veronica Weber.

The campaign working to unseat Santa Clara County Judge Aaron Persky, sparked by his sentencing of former Stanford University student Brock Turner to six months in county jail, released this weekend a detailed statement criticizing a state judicial commission that recently cleared him of any misconduct.

The seven-page response calls the Commission on Judicial Performance’s December report — which found Persky did not abuse his authority nor exhibit bias in sentencing Turner last summer nor in other cases that have been cited by the recall campaign as evidence of his bias — flawed, inaccurate and “nontransparent.”

“This was a one-sided, closed-door proceeding that resulted in an error-ridden report … by an agency with a long history of protecting judges,” the response states. [Read Full Article]

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print

Filed Under: News

Family Law Documentary Trailer

Recent News

MPs Debate Keira’s Law to Require Judicial Training on Domestic Violence (Canada)

April 30, 2022

OTTAWA - Judges will have to undergo regular … [Read More...]

Did the System Fail 3-Year-Old Sophia Gasperino?

April 26, 2022

Rebekah Gasperino charged with aggravated murder … [Read More...]

5 Years After South Pasadena Boy’s Murder, His Mother Tries to Find Peace and Purpose

April 22, 2022

Garfield Park in South Pasadena used to be a place … [Read More...]

CA Committee Launches Year-Long Review of Commission on Judicial Performance

April 20, 2022

[Calif.] The Committee to Review the Operations … [Read More...]

More news

News Archive

Contact Us

P.O. Box 150793
San Rafael, California 94915
Phone: 415-444-6556
Email:
info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org

Find Us on Facebook

Follow CJE on Twitter

My Tweets

Email List Signup

By entering your email address and clicking "Subscribe" you agree to receive email communications from the Center for Judicial Excellence.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Translate This Site

CJE DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. We want to hear your story, however, please be advised, if you choose to share information with us, we can not guarantee your privacy.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; CJE and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the appropriate jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances whether the information contained herein applies to your particular situation.

 

Copyright © 2022 Center for Judicial Excellence. All Rights Reserved.

Log in