Center for Judicial Excellence

Justice. Accountability. Integrity.

  • About Us
    • Board of Directors
    • CJE Staff
  • Donate
  • Contact CJE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Initiatives
    • Advocacy
      • Media Advocacy
      • Policy & Legislation
      • Prior Legislative Victories
    • Educating Oversight Agencies
    • U.S. Divorce Child Murder Data
    • Marin Court Misconduct
  • Multimedia
    • Kids of Divorce Speak Out
    • CJE in the News
      • PRINT
      • TV & RADIO
      • Press Releases
    • The Director’s Corner
    • Multimedia Projects
      • Film
      • Photo Exhibit
      • Slideshow
    • Photo Gallery
  • Santa Monica Weekend
    • People’s Choice Award!
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Forums & Events
    • 10 Year Anniversary Campaign
  • Take Action!
    • Join CJE
  • Resources
    • Family Court Crisis Background
    • Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Resources
    • Pro Bono Services, Self-Help Centers & Court Information
  • Membership
  • News
  • Blog
You are here: Home / News / Recall campaign: State ruling that cleared judge is ‘error-ridden’

Recall campaign: State ruling that cleared judge is ‘error-ridden’

January 9, 2017

Michele Dauber, Stanford law professor and chair of the Recall Persky campaign, speaks during a rally in downtown San Jose following the Sept. 2, 2016, release of Brock Turner, who served half of his six-month sentence. Photo by Veronica Weber.

The campaign working to unseat Santa Clara County Judge Aaron Persky, sparked by his sentencing of former Stanford University student Brock Turner to six months in county jail, released this weekend a detailed statement criticizing a state judicial commission that recently cleared him of any misconduct.

The seven-page response calls the Commission on Judicial Performance’s December report — which found Persky did not abuse his authority nor exhibit bias in sentencing Turner last summer nor in other cases that have been cited by the recall campaign as evidence of his bias — flawed, inaccurate and “nontransparent.”

“This was a one-sided, closed-door proceeding that resulted in an error-ridden report … by an agency with a long history of protecting judges,” the response states. [Read Full Article]

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print

Filed Under: News

Family Law Documentary Trailer

Recent News

CJE Divorce Child Homicide Data featured in Gillian Friedman’s investigation, Fatal Court

September 27, 2019

Our U.S. Divorce Child Homicide Data is featured … [Read More...]

‘A gendered trap’: When mothers allege child abuse by fathers, the mothers often lose custody, study shows

July 31, 2019

From the July 29th edition of The Washington … [Read More...]

CJE in the NYTimes ~ She Went to Court to Save Her 3-Year-Old Daughter

July 25, 2019

From the July 22, 2019 edition of the New York … [Read More...]

Bitter Custody ~ Story aired on Saturday, March 9 on NPR/KQED

July 16, 2019

The Center for Judicial Excellence has been … [Read More...]

More news

News Archive

Contact Us

P.O. Box 150793
San Rafael, California 94915
Phone: 415-444-6556
Email:
info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org

Find Us on Facebook

Follow CJE on Twitter

My Tweets

Email List Signup

CJE DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. If you have a legal problem, seek professional legal counsel. We want to hear your story, however, please be advised, if you choose to share information with us, we can not guarantee your privacy.

 

Copyright © 2019 Center for Judicial Excellence. All Rights Reserved.

Log in