Center for Judicial Excellence

Justice. Accountability. Integrity.

  • About Us
    • Board of Directors
    • CJE Staff
  • Donate
  • Contact CJE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Initiatives
    • Advocacy
      • Media Advocacy
      • Policy & Legislation
      • Prior Legislative Victories
    • Educating Oversight Agencies
    • U.S. Divorce Child Murder Data
    • Marin Court Misconduct
  • Resources
    • Family Court Crisis Background
    • Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Resources
    • Pro Bono Services, Self-Help Centers & Court Information
  • Multimedia
    • Kids of Divorce Speak Out
    • CJE in the News
      • PRINT
      • TV & RADIO
      • Press Releases
    • The Director’s Corner
    • Multimedia Projects
      • Film
      • Photo Exhibit
      • Slideshow
    • Photo Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Forums & Events
    • Santa Monica Weekend
    • People’s Choice Award!
    • 10 Year Anniversary Campaign
  • Take Action!
    • Join CJE
  • Membership
  • News
  • Blog
You are here: Home / News / 8/10/2016 Press Release: California Judicial Watchdog Faces First Audit in 56 Years

8/10/2016 Press Release: California Judicial Watchdog Faces First Audit in 56 Years

August 10, 2016

8/10/2016 Press Release: California Judicial Watchdog Faces First Audit in 56 Years (PDF)

CJE Logo

For Immediate Release:
August 10, 2016

Media Contacts:
Kathleen Russell
Joseph Sweeney 

California Lawmakers Order First Audit of State’s Judicial Oversight Agency in 56 Years

Request to Audit the Commission on Judicial Performance Was Passed at Today’s Joint Legislative Audit Committee Hearing

SAN RAFAEL- In a unanimous vote from the consent calendar, members of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee in the California Legislature passed an historic request this morning to audit the California Commission on Judicial Performance for the first time since it was established in 1961. Since its inception, this small but powerful judicial oversight agency has operated in relative secrecy, until June of this year, when Santa Clara County Judge Aaron Persky’s lenient sentencing of Stanford University student rapist Brock Turner created a national outcry that unwittingly thrust the agency into the media spotlight.

“The Center for Public Integrity gave California an ‘F grade’ on its 2015 report card for judicial accountability, said Kathleen Russell, the executive director of the Center for Judicial Excellence. “California’s lack of judicial accountability is renowned, and it weakens the public’s trust in its judges,’ she continued, “so this audit is an important step toward creating a culture of accountability for our state’s nearly 2,000 judges.”

Senator Hannah Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Assemblywoman Catharine Baker (R-San Ramon), an attorney, worked collaboratively to develop a balanced, comprehensive audit request which addresses both the public’s concerns about a lack of transparency and extremely low discipline rates, and the judges’ due process concerns about Commission investigations. The chair of the Assembly Judiciary Committee, Assemblyman Mark Stone (D- Monterey Bay), and the chair of the Accountability & Administrative Review Committee, Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia (D- Bell Gardens), also signed on as co-authors of the request.

The audit request received support from the state’s powerful Service Employees International Union (SEIU California), the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence (CPEDV) and the Sacramento Chapter of the NAACP, along with more than a dozen court reform and child protection organizations. A number of audit supporters have been working to expose widespread corruption in the family court system that many say has created an epidemic of judicial trafficking of abused children away from their protective parents and into abusive homes during divorces and separations. 

The Commission on Judicial Performance was established by constitutional amendment in 1960. Its mandate, as stated by the amendment’s authors, Senators Edward J. Regan and Joseph A. Rattigan, is to protect the public against “incompetency, misconduct or nonperformance of duty on the Bench.” The Senators intended the CJP to provide “an effective and expeditious method for the removal of a judge who is unable or unwilling to perform his duties.” The fact that less than 2% of public complaints result in judicial discipline – and 80% of all discipline is private – shows how far the agency has strayed from its original mission.

The estimated cost of the audit is $492,480 and the State Auditor estimates that it will take 4,104 staff hours to complete.

Recent Audits Related to the California Judicial Branch:

2015-030 – State Bar of California: It Has Not Consistently Protected the Public Through Its Attorney Discipline Process and Lacks Accountability (June 2015)

2014-107 – Judicial Branch of California: Because of Questionable Fiscal and Operational Decisions, the Judicial Council and the Administrative Office of the Courts Have Not Maximized the Funds Available for the Courts (January 2015)

“When judges know that their oversight agency is going to take every complaint seriously and be held publicly accountable, that is going to result in less misconduct,” said Joe Sweeney, founder of Court Reform LLC, an advocacy group that has helped pushed for the audit.

###

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print

Filed Under: News

Family Law Documentary Trailer

Recent News

In Non-Criminal Courts, You Could Lose Your Kids, Your Home, and Your Freedom Without the Right to Legal Advice

February 27, 2021

The right for criminal defendants in the U.S. to … [Read More...]

“Parental Alienation” is Misused, Has No Scientific Evidence, and Should Have No Place in Our Law or Legal System

February 26, 2021

Despite there being no scientific evidence for it, … [Read More...]

Bill Seeks to Protect Children Against Abusive Parents in Family Court Proceedings

February 25, 2021

Kudos to our colleague Camille Cooper (RAINN) and … [Read More...]

Filmmakers Look at Woody Allen Abuse Allegations in Four-Part Series

February 10, 2021

“Allen v. Farrow” is a four-part docuseries … [Read More...]

More news

News Archive

Contact Us

P.O. Box 150793
San Rafael, California 94915
Phone: 415-444-6556
Email:
info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org

Find Us on Facebook

Follow CJE on Twitter

My Tweets

Email List Signup

CJE DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. We want to hear your story, however, please be advised, if you choose to share information with us, we can not guarantee your privacy.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; CJE and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the appropriate jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances whether the information contained herein applies to your particular situation.

 

Copyright © 2021 Center for Judicial Excellence. All Rights Reserved.

Log in